Sojourn of Ben

In the previous posts, You can see that the different types of media are discussing a situation in which the United States is trying to convince Iran to halt it's nuclear weapons operations. The Video is an "Inside Story" from Youtube.com. The Article is from the New York Times.

The article is an unbiased piece of journalism. It talks about how the government is coming up with a way to confront Iran about the nuclear capabilities, and in the video, President Bush has already spoken to the United Arabic Emerance, warning them that they needed to stop Iran "before it is too late."

The Biggest difference between the two pieces of media is that one is a news article, and one is a video. I Believe that the video would be the most appealing thing. The video actually shows you some clips from Iran. It also shows a clip from Bush's speech.

The Article was a two pages from nypost.com. I had a really hard time to read all of it while staying interested in the subject. It contained almost all of the same information, but the video had more than one voice. There were four people talking about the same topic. It was a lot easier/efficient to watch the video. I also believe that the video was a lot more informational than the article.

Ultimately, I would say that I prefer the video.